Rochester residents are requesting that the Town Planning Board pause advancement of the proposed border rezoning near Mary’s Pond Road to pursue a comprehensive, independent impact analysis sufficient to justify the Planning Board’s recommendation and establish a defensible public record.
Recent public statements attributed to a Planning Board member suggested that the Town faces financial strain, that rezoning would increase tax revenue, and that surrounding property values would rise, despite the absence of a traffic study, fiscal analysis, or defined development plan. Residents say assertions of this magnitude require supporting analysis beyond blanketed statements. Planning Board officials, as recently as February 6th, indicated that no such studies have been conducted.
If rezoning is expected to generate net fiscal benefit, Town residents want disclosure of a cost-of-services or fiscal impact study accounting for public safety, public works, capital, and long-term infrastructure obligations. If property values are expected to increase, residents want to know how and why. Residents should be provided an empirical valuation analysis supporting that conclusion. If traffic impacts are presumed manageable, the residents request standard trip-generation and level-of-service modeling to substantiate the claim. Thus far, no supporting evidence has been furnished.
The affected parcels are located within an area predominantly zoned Residential/Agricultural, subject to groundwater and watershed overlays, and are not contiguous with existing Limited Commercial districts. Put simply, rezoning without a defined project scope or impact analysis does not constitute responsible, evidence-based planning.
Established planning standards do not permit zoning changes to be justified by hypothetical future uses or generalized claims of economic benefit without a defined proposal and supporting analysis. Proceeding without that foundation introduces avoidable risk and undermines the integrity of the Town’s adopted planning framework.
In response to the Planning Board’s Notice of Hearing, several Town residents cited inconsistencies with the Town’s Comprehensive Master Plan and requested that the Planning Board put forth a Town Meeting warrant authorizing a not-to-exceed appropriation to fund a comprehensive, independently procured study. The scope would include fiscal modeling, traffic impact analysis, groundwater and environmental review, property value assessment, commercial demand analysis, legal sufficiency review, and independent peer review. However, these studies do not come with a small price tag and can cost taxpayers or a potential developer upwards of approximately $1.5 million. Although, authorizing the estimate does not obligate full expenditure; residents in opposition to the amendment hold that it ensures analytical objectivity and integrity of process.
Importantly, these residents maintain that their request does not represent opposition to economic development, but instead, a request for substantiation prior to altering zoning classifications and reallocating development rights.
If the proposal is as financially beneficial and low-impact as suggested, a comprehensive analysis should confirm it. If not, the Town’s taxpayers deserve that information before proceeding with the Planning Board’s recommendation.
###